January 18, 2026
Abolishing ICE isn’t enough – it’s time to center people’s humanity | Heba Gowayed and Victor Ray
In their report, Heba Gowayed and Victor Ray highlight the killing of Renee Good by ICE agent Jonathan Ross, which sparked national protests and underscored the agency's violent history, including numerous instances of shootings and inhumane detention conditions. They argue that the formation of ICE in 2003 reflects a long-standing racial bias in U.S. immigration policy, targeting Black and brown individuals under the guise of national security. The authors conclude that merely abolishing ICE is insufficient; instead, a fundamental shift towards centering human dignity and expanding legal protections for immigrants is necessary to address systemic violence. They advocate for a complete reevaluation of the current immigration enforcement paradigm to prioritize humanity over security.

Stoic Response
Correspondence to a Roman Magistrate
1. The Voice of Reason: A Call to Humanity
Esteemed magistrate, in the spirit of our forebears, let us reflect upon the tragic demise of a mother, Renee Good, whose life was extinguished by the very agents tasked with safeguarding our society. As Musonius Rufus would remind us, “The greatest good is to act justly.” The indignation sparked by her death is not merely a fleeting sentiment; it is a clarion call to acknowledge the systemic violence embedded within our institutions, echoing the ancient wisdom that a society’s measure lies in how it treats its most vulnerable.
2. The Weight of Statistics: A Nation's Conscience
Consider this: since the inception of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency in 2003, there have been 32 deaths in custody in just one year alone—matching a grim record from two decades prior. This statistic is not merely a number; it represents lives lost, families shattered, and a moral failing that we must confront. As Seneca wisely stated, “A good character, when established, is unshaken by external events.” We must fortify our character as a nation by addressing these injustices with urgency and resolve.
3. The Moral Stakes: A Reflection on Justice
The case of Renee Good reveals a deeper malaise: the racial biases that have long pervaded our immigration policies, casting non-white immigrants as threats to our safety. It is a tragic irony that the very constructs meant to protect us have become instruments of oppression. The moral stakes are clear: we must not only condemn the actions of individuals but also dismantle the systems that allow such violence to persist. As Musonius would assert, “A wise man will not be swayed by the opinions of the multitude.” Let us stand firm in our pursuit of justice.
4. Practical Maxims for Change
In closing, let us embrace these practical maxims:
- Prioritize Humanity: Shift from a security-centric approach to one that centers human dignity in immigration policy.
- Expand Legal Protections: Ensure that every individual facing deportation has access to legal counsel.
- Dismantle Oppressive Structures: Recognize that mere abolition of ICE is insufficient; we must reevaluate and reform the entire immigration enforcement paradigm.
- Act with Integrity: Uphold justice not as a reaction to outrage, but as a steadfast commitment to our shared humanity.
Let us not falter in our duty to create a society where justice prevails for all.
Article Rewritten Through Stoic Lens
The Stoic Reflection on the Tragedy of Renee Good
Introduction
On January 7, 2026, the tragic death of Renee Good at the hands of an ICE agent serves as a stark reminder of the complexities of justice, virtue, and the human condition. This event, while deeply saddening, invites us to reflect rationally on the systemic issues that underpin such occurrences, rather than merely reacting with emotion.
The Nature of the Incident
The circumstances surrounding Good's death, including derogatory remarks made posthumously, highlight a troubling aspect of human behavior: the tendency to dehumanize others. Such actions are not merely reflections of individual character but are symptomatic of a broader societal malaise. The killing itself is not an isolated incident; investigations reveal a pattern of violence associated with the agency, including multiple instances of gunfire directed at civilians.
The Role of ICE
The creation of ICE in 2003, during a period marked by national insecurity, reflects a misguided response to perceived threats. This agency was established under the premise that non-white immigrants posed a risk to national safety, a notion that has historical roots in the U.S. immigration policy. The Stoic perspective urges us to examine the causes of this belief system rather than assigning blame to individuals.
Historical Context
The immigration policies of the United States have long been influenced by racial biases, from the Naturalization Act of 1790 to the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. These historical precedents illustrate a persistent pattern of injustice that has shaped the current landscape. The Stoic philosopher recognizes that while we cannot change the past, we can learn from it and strive to cultivate a system grounded in virtue and justice.
The Illusion of Security
The belief that increased militarization and enforcement will lead to safety is a fallacy. The evidence suggests otherwise; the deaths of individuals in custody and the ongoing violence only reinforce the notion that such measures are counterproductive. As Stoics, we must focus on what is within our control: our responses to these injustices and our commitment to advocate for a more humane approach to immigration.
The Call for Reevaluation
The authors argue for a reevaluation of the immigration enforcement paradigm, emphasizing the need to center human dignity and expand legal protections. This call aligns with Stoic principles, which advocate for justice, wisdom, and temperance. It is essential to recognize that true safety cannot be achieved through violence or oppression. Instead, we must cultivate a society that prioritizes the inherent worth of every individual.
The Path Forward
To address the systemic issues highlighted by Good's death and the broader implications of ICE's actions, we must advocate for legal reforms that ensure due process for all individuals facing deportation. This includes access to legal representation and the expansion of pathways to legal status.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the tragedy of Renee Good serves as a poignant reminder of the need for a fundamental shift in our approach to immigration enforcement. By embracing Stoic virtues—courage, wisdom, justice, and temperance—we can work towards a system that honors human dignity and fosters a just society. The path forward requires reflection, advocacy, and a commitment to principles that prioritize humanity over fear.
Source Body Text
On 7 January 2026, Renee Good was killed by ICE agent Jonathan Ross; video captures a man’s voice calling her a “fucking bitch” afterwards. Kristi Noem, secretary of homeland security, maligned Good as having committed “domestic terrorism”. Good’s killing became a national flashpoint as protests erupted demanding justice for the mother of three. Good’s killing is no anomaly. A Wall Street Journal investigation revealed 13 instances of ICE firing into civilian vehicles since July 2025, with at least eight people shot and two killed. ICE detentions are notorious for their inhumane conditions; 32 people died in ICE custody in 2025 alone, matching a record set two decades prior in 2004. That a white woman can be killed on camera, with impunity, and be demeaned and ridiculed in her death for standing up for her neighbors shows just how far down the road of violence the nation has gone. It is a road most Americans do not want to continue on – recent polling shows the majority disapprove of how ICE operates. But to truly stop the damage requires going further – it means eradicating the security logic that ever made people think that arming a secret police on an ethnic cleansing mission could ever make them safe. Formed in 2003, during the embarrassing and disastrous national excesses of the post-9/11 era – when the nation launched two ill-fated forever wars, and demonized Muslim immigrants – ICE’s mandate was overwrought and ill-considered. Its formation was part of the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) which – as illustrated by its name – formally adopted the idea that immigrants were an inherent security threat to Americans. The casting of non-white immigrants as threats is not itself new – it defines the nation’s immigration system from the first act in 1790, which limited naturalization to “free white persons”, to the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, to the whites-only racial quotas for migration that came soon after. In the wake of the civil rights movement and the abolition of racial quotas with the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, the United States went from 86% white to just under 60%. And, while immigration law was race-neutral, its policies turned to criminalize increasingly Black and brown immigrants. In 1986, Ronald Reagan coupled the country’s only amnesty program with a seven-fold increase in border enforcement – beginning an arms race that would shape border violence for decades. But it was Bill Clinton’s 1996 signing of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) set the stage for our current mass deportation system, by making deportation easier, and making more people deportable, even for nonviolent crimes. IIRIRA stripped many immigrants of the ability to argue their cases in front of a judge and closed pathways by which undocumented people could become documented. Then came ICE. Mandated with targeting 100% of people who are “deportable”, the agency has long been unfettered by the (already limited) regulations placed on police or prisons in the criminal legal system. People in ICE detention are not entitled to a lawyer or the due process protections afforded to people within the criminal legal system. Even before the supreme court authorized ICE to racially profile this past September, the agency had a long documented history of racial profiling and racism. US citizens have been caught in its net – including in one harrowing case where a man named Davino Watson was detained for 1,273 days, despite repeatedly telling officers that he was a citizen. He never received compensation. From the start, ICE has been a racial project, with its armed operatives targeting Black and brown people. Its categorical mission and lack of oversight are reminiscent of slave patrols tasked with hunting down fugitives. In the wake of Good’s killing, politicians have claimed that ICE needs better training. The problem, as they see it, is the ramp-up of ICE under Trump, with a $75bn increase in funding. But Jonathan Ross has been with ICE for a decade. Ross wasn’t one of the subpar new recruits who can’t run a mile and a half; according to testimony he gave in December, obtained by Wired, he was a firearms trainer, team leader, and elite member of its special response unit – a Swat team. Seen from this vantage, Good’s killing is not a “mistake” but a reflection of how the agency is designed to operate. Take it from the border czar, Tom Homan, who said: “There will be more bloodshed unless we decrease the hateful rhetoric.” In other words, Homan, who received an award for his service under Obama, after introducing the idea of family separation, is telling citizens that exercising their constitutional right to speech will prompt government agents to gun them down. Abolishing an agency that teargasses two-year-olds and shoots mothers in the street isn’t radical. It is basic human decency. Yet Democratic leadership has refused to back the call to defund ICE, with thinktanks suggesting “abolish ICE” goes too far. “Abolish ICE” does not go far enough. We need to move away from a system predicated on violence in favor of one that centers people’s humanity. We need to ensure that every human in the United States facing a legal process – including deportation – has access to a lawyer. We need to expand our legal pathways rather than truncate them. And we need to divest from the logic that violence makes us safer – Renee Good’s killing, the killing of Keith Porter by an off-duty agent, and the deaths of Parady La, Luis Beltran Yanez-Cruz, Luis Gustavo Nunez Caceres and Geraldo Lunas Campos, who all died in immigration custody already this year – prove without a doubt that it will not, regardless of the passport you carry. Heba Gowayed is an associate professor of sociology at Cuny Hunter College and Cuny Graduate Center and author of the book Refuge: How the State Shapes Human Potential Victor Ray is the F Wendell Miller associate professor of sociology at the University of Iowa and author of the book On Critical Race Theory: Why It Matters & Why You Should Care