A Stoic SaysA Stoic Says logo - Daily Stoic philosophy and wisdom

February 10, 2026

Gavin Newsom’s likely presidential bid is built on broken promises | Gil Durán

Gavin Newsom's potential presidential campaign is characterized by a strategy of mimicking Donald Trump's brashness while facing scrutiny over his record of broken promises as California's governor. Despite his initial progressive pledges, such as implementing single-payer healthcare and building millions of new housing units, Newsom has failed to deliver on these commitments, often retreating to less ambitious goals. This pattern of inconsistency raises questions about his leadership and authenticity, particularly as he attempts to position himself as a strong alternative to Trumpism. As he gears up for a 2028 run, the contrast between his rhetorical bravado and legislative shortcomings may alienate voters seeking genuine change.

Thumbnail for Gavin Newsom’s likely presidential bid is built on broken promises | Gil Durán

Stoic Response

Politics & GovernanceJustice & RightsCulture & Identity

Stoic Meditation for Dawn Practice

As dawn breaks, we are reminded of the ever-turning wheel of life. In this moment, we reflect on the nature of leadership and the virtues we seek in those who guide us.

Author's Claim

Gavin Newsom's strategy of mimicking Donald Trump’s brashness, while facing scrutiny for his broken promises as California's governor, raises questions about his authenticity and leadership. The claim that “Americans prefer strong and wrong over weak and right” suggests a troubling acceptance of superficiality over substance.

Weighing Against Nature and Logos

Nature teaches us that true strength lies in integrity and consistency. The Stoics believed in living in accordance with virtue, suggesting that a leader’s worth is measured not by their bravado but by their actions and the principles they uphold. As we consider Newsom’s record of broken promises—such as his failure to implement single-payer healthcare and his retreat from ambitious housing goals—we see a disconnect from the Stoic ideals of courage and wisdom.

Paraphrased Insight: "To lead is to embody the virtues one espouses; mere mimicry of strength is a façade that will ultimately crumble."

Actionable Reflections

  1. Self-Examination: As you rise with the sun, reflect on your own commitments. Are there areas in your life where you have promised more than you have delivered? Take a moment to write down one commitment you will honor today.

  2. Seek Authenticity: Consider the leaders in your life—both personal and public. What qualities do you value most? Strive to embody those virtues in your interactions today, ensuring that your actions align with your words.

  3. Embrace Accountability: Recognize that true strength is found in accountability. If you falter, acknowledge it, learn from it, and recommit to your path. Make a plan to address one area where you have fallen short.

  4. Cultivate Resilience: Understand that the path of integrity may not always be the easiest. Prepare yourself mentally for challenges that may arise as you strive to live authentically. Remind yourself that enduring hardship with virtue is the essence of Stoic strength.

As the day unfolds, carry these reflections with you. Let them guide your actions and decisions, ensuring that you remain anchored in your values amidst the noise of the world.

Article Rewritten Through Stoic Lens

A Stoic Reflection on Gavin Newsom's Political Aspirations

Introduction

In considering the potential presidential campaign of Gavin Newsom, we must approach the matter with a rational perspective, focusing on the virtues of wisdom, courage, justice, and temperance. The actions and statements of public figures reveal much about their character and intentions, and it is essential to discern what lies within our control and what does not.

The Nature of Leadership

Newsom's recent declaration that Americans prefer "strong and wrong" leaders over those who adhere to principles of integrity and decorum invites scrutiny. The Stoic philosopher recognizes that true strength lies not in bravado, but in the steadfast pursuit of virtue. While Newsom seeks to emulate the boldness of figures like Donald Trump, we must ask: Does this imitation reflect a commitment to justice and wisdom, or does it reveal a deeper inconsistency in his leadership?

The Record of Promises

Upon assuming the governorship of California, Newsom presented himself as a progressive champion, advocating for ambitious reforms such as single-payer healthcare and extensive housing development. However, the Stoic perspective encourages us to assess the outcomes of these promises. The failure to fulfill these commitments raises questions not only about his leadership but also about the nature of ambition itself.

In the realm of governance, the virtue of temperance is paramount. Newsom's retreat from bold promises to more modest goals suggests a lack of clarity in purpose. As we reflect on his tenure, we must consider the implications of such inconsistencies on the trust of the electorate.

Accountability and Responsibility

When faced with challenges, Newsom's responses often reflect a tendency to deflect responsibility. For instance, his initial decisive actions during the COVID-19 pandemic were commendable; however, as pressures mounted, he shifted responsibility to local officials. This behavior illustrates a failure to embody the Stoic principle of accountability, which emphasizes the importance of owning one's decisions and their consequences.

Moreover, his approach to the issue of homelessness in California reveals a similar pattern. Promising to appoint a "homeless czar," he later assumed that role himself, yet the rising numbers of those experiencing homelessness suggest a disconnect between intention and action. Here, we see a critical examination of cause and effect, reminding us that the path to justice requires both vision and execution.

The Influence of External Factors

In navigating the political landscape, Newsom has aligned himself with powerful interests, raising questions about his commitment to the common good. The Stoic philosopher understands that external influences can often lead one astray from virtuous action. By prioritizing the interests of affluent donors over the needs of the populace, Newsom's actions may reflect a compromise of integrity.

This alignment with figures such as Peter Thiel, a known supporter of Trump, underscores the complexity of political motivations. It is essential to recognize that while external factors may influence decisions, the ultimate responsibility for those choices lies within the individual.

The Pursuit of Authentic Leadership

As Newsom contemplates a run for the presidency in 2028, the contrast between his rhetoric and his record becomes increasingly apparent. The Stoic perspective encourages us to seek authenticity in leadership—an authenticity grounded in moral principles and a commitment to the greater good.

In times of uncertainty, the electorate often seeks leaders who embody competence and vision. The question remains: Can Newsom reconcile his past with a future that genuinely reflects the values he professes to uphold? The Stoic would argue that the path to true leadership lies in the cultivation of virtue, not in the mimicry of others.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Gavin Newsom's political journey serves as a reminder of the complexities inherent in leadership. As we reflect on his actions and aspirations, we must strive to cultivate the virtues of wisdom, courage, justice, and temperance within ourselves. Ultimately, it is through the practice of these virtues that we can discern the qualities of authentic leadership and the true nature of strength. The pursuit of genuine change requires not only ambition but also a steadfast commitment to the principles that guide us toward a more just and equitable society.

Source Body Text

Gavin Newsom has stumbled upon the perfect slogan for his likely upcoming presidential campaign: “Strong and Wrong.” In a recent interview, California’s governor said Americans prefer crude politicians like Donald Trump over leaders who cling to niceties and norms. “Given the choice … the American people always support strong and wrong versus weak and right,” he said. This explains why Newsom now spends his days mimicking Trump – lobbing crude insults and mockery on social media. The governor – who has confirmed he’s mulling a 2028 run – plans to defeat Trumpism by imitating Trump. His amusing copycat antics have generated media attention, boosted his poll numbers and earned him the label of Democratic “frontrunner”. But the termed-out governor has a reality check in the mail, since his presidential ambitions will soon bring scrutiny of his record. Unfortunately for Newsom, his eight-year tenure as governor offers a buffet of failed hopes and broken promises. The politician who recently blasted world leaders’ responses to Trump as “pathetic” has a talent for talking big but falling short. Newsom ran for governor in 2018 as an unabashed progressive, bristling with liberal righteousness, under a campaign slogan of “courage for a change”. This seemed like a jab at his predecessor, Governor Jerry Brown, the elder statesman who focused on stabilizing California’s budget after years of massive deficits. To prove his grit – and to win support from the powerful California nurses’ union – Newsom said he would seek to create a single-payer public healthcare system in the state. When a critic assailed this as a “pipe dream”, Newsom chided their lack of vision. “I’m tired of politicians saying they support single-payer but that it’s too soon, too expensive or someone else’s problem,” he said. Then, as governor, he dumped his signature campaign pledge, opting for lesser reforms. “This is a flip-flop,” said one union organizer of Newsom’s betrayal. “This is absolutely unacceptable.” Unfazed, Newsom moved on to other bold visions. In 2019, he promised to build 3.5 million new units of housing by 2025. Three years later, he backed away from that idea, too, dismissing it as a mere “stretch goal”. “Just 13% of the 3.5 million homes he campaigned on building have been permitted, let alone built,” reported CalMatters in 2022. Newsom also pledged to appoint a “homeless czar” to address California’s surging homelessness. That promise also fell through the cracks. Frustrated by reporter questions, Newsom eventually declared himself the homeless czar. Then, as homeless numbers spiked, he pivoted to blaming local officials. Newsom spent unprecedented amounts of money on these issues – thanks to multibillion-dollar surpluses he inherited from his fiscally disciplined predecessor. But when it came to delivering on his key proposals, Newsom flopped. Making matters worse, the California legislative analyst’s office says he’ll leave the state with looming multibillion-dollar deficits. Newsom says Americans want strength, but his wishy-washy ways are legendary in Sacramento. As a staunch opponent of the death penalty, Newsom declared a moratorium on capital punishment in 2019. Yet he stopped short of commuting death sentences to life imprisonment, meaning the next governor can resume executions. During the early days of Covid in 2020, Newsom drew praise for his decisive action to halt the spread. Then, after Elon Musk reopened his California Tesla factory in violation of public health rules and rightwingers began protesting against lockdowns, Newsom caved. He rushed to reopen the state and push responsibility down to county officials. Infections and deaths surged. After the police killing of George Floyd, Newsom embraced the idea of reparations for descendants of slavery. He created a Reparations Task Force to propose legislation, earning him national headlines. In 2025, with racial justice out of style, Newsom vetoed many of the taskforce’s most significant bills to provide tangible reparations. “Mr Newsom may have less political motivation than he did before as he weighs the possibility of running for president in 2028,” reported the New York Times. “A majority of Americans oppose taxpayer-funded reparations, and the nation as a whole is more conservative than California.” Politicians shapeshift frequently, but it takes gall for the Golden state’s squishy governor to criticize other leaders as pathetic. In fact, Newsom pioneered the art of placating Trump – praising his botched Covid response in 2020 even though Trump had called the pandemic a “hoax” that would “disappear”. “He said everything that I could have hoped for,” Newsom said in March 2020, after talking with the president. “Every single thing he said, they followed through.” “Newsom has repeatedly said he has no criticisms for Trump’s coronavirus response,” reported the Sacramento Bee. “Yet his state is still waiting on needed equipment from the federal government to run tests and prepare its medical system for a surge in new patients – equipment the Democratic governor says he’s been requesting for weeks.” In Newsom’s defense, Trump had warned governors to be “appreciative” if they wanted federal help. So, Governor Knee Pads puckered up. “Governor Newsom has been very generous in his words, and I’m being generous to him, too,” Trump said. Newsom’s Trump-loving phase was among the lowest points of his career. He understands exactly why many world leaders now hesitate to provoke Trump’s wrath. But while he disparages others as cowards, his own courage remains quite selective. For example, Newsom is largely silent about the California tech oligarchs backing Trump’s regime. In 2024, he sided with many Silicon Valley venture capitalists and tech companies to veto an expansive AI safety bill. He signed a narrower version in 2025, but critics say he’s avoiding tough questions about how AI will kill jobs and harm workers. “This is a ‘which side are you on’ moment,” said the AFL-CIO president, Liz Schuler, at a press conference on 4 February where labor leaders from swing states threatened to complicate Newsom’s presidential run unless he stops siding with his “big tech billionaire friends” over workers. Tellingly, Newsom currently finds himself aligned with Peter Thiel – a Trump backer and major donor to Newsom’s gubernatorial campaign – in an effort to kill a union-backed billionaire tax that would help offset Trump’s healthcare cuts. Newsom mocks others for kowtowing, but he regularly bows down to the powerful California interests bankrolling the very authoritarianism from which he claims he can save the nation. This glaring hypocrisy fits with Newsom’s embrace of Trumpian tactics, but even his overwrought trolling shtick is a symptom of weakness. Desperate to cover up his liberal California past, he hosts rightwing figures like Steve Bannon and Ben Shapiro on his podcast, berates world leaders for the cameras, and pushes the cynical idea that Americans’ only choice is between glib loudmouths in different colored ties. Like Trump, Newsom breaks promises, serves billionaire interests and mistakes social media theatrics for leadership. Is that really what American voters will want in 2028? After Richard Nixon, Americans chose Jimmy Carter. After George W Bush, they chose Barack Obama. After Trump, they’ll likely want change – authentic, strong, moral leadership, a leader with competence and vision. Having watched Newsom for two decades, I don’t see why anyone thinks he’s it. He’s not even “strong and wrong” – just highly ambitious, strategically dishonest and blatantly opportunistic. Gil Durán is a California journalist and author of the forthcoming book The Nerd Reich: Silicon Valley Fascism and the War On Democracy. He was an adviser to several Democratic politicians