February 28, 2026
Why in the world is Melania Trump leading a UN security council meeting? | Arwa Mahdawi
Briefing Summary:
Melania Trump is set to lead a United Nations Security Council session, marking a significant departure from traditional qualifications for such roles. This unusual appointment reflects the Trump administration's broader trend of prioritizing loyalty over expertise, undermining the credibility of multilateral institutions like the UN. The move signals a potential shift towards a more unilateral approach to international relations, raising concerns about the future of global cooperation and governance.

Stoic Response
Citizens of the Agora,
Today, we gather in the spirit of civic duty and moral reflection, compelled to address a matter that strikes at the very heart of our shared values: the integrity of our institutions. The recent appointment of Melania Trump to lead a session of the United Nations Security Council underscores a troubling trend where loyalty is prioritized over expertise. This is not merely a political maneuver; it is a challenge to our commitment to wisdom, one of the cardinal virtues that should guide our leaders.
Let us consider the implications of this decision. A recent report indicates that the United States owes over $4 billion in UN arrears, yet the administration seems more focused on consolidating power than fulfilling its international obligations. This shift reflects a broader narrative where the pursuit of personal or political gain takes precedence over the collective good. Such actions threaten the foundational principle of justice, which demands that we hold our leaders accountable to a higher standard, one that prioritizes the welfare of all over the whims of the few.
As we stand at this crossroads, we must ask ourselves: what kind of governance do we wish to uphold? The virtues of courage and temperance call us to resist the allure of populism that undermines our democratic institutions. We must advocate for a multilateral approach to international relations, one that fosters cooperation and mutual respect rather than unilateral dictates. Our future depends on our ability to engage with the world through dialogue and understanding, not through division and contempt.
I charge each of you, as stewards of our democracy, to remain vigilant. Engage in discourse, educate yourselves, and hold your leaders accountable. Let us not be passive observers in this unfolding drama but active participants who demand integrity and expertise from those who represent us on the world stage. We must uphold the virtue of prudence, discerning the true qualifications of those who seek to lead us.
Together, let us reaffirm our commitment to the principles that unite us as a society. Stand firm in your convictions, and let your voices resonate in the halls of power. The strength of our democracy lies not just in the actions of a few, but in the collective will of the many. Rise, citizens, and let us shape a future that reflects our highest ideals!
Article Rewritten Through Stoic Lens
A Stoic Reflection on Leadership and Governance
Introduction
In the realm of governance, we observe the recent appointment of Melania Trump to lead a session of the United Nations Security Council. This event, while notable, invites us to reflect on the nature of qualifications and the principles that guide our actions in public service. As Stoics, we must focus on virtue, wisdom, courage, justice, and temperance, assessing what lies within our control and what does not.
The Nature of Qualifications
The appointment of Melania Trump, a figure primarily known for her association with the Trump family, raises questions about the essence of qualifications in leadership roles. Traditionally, such positions require a foundation of expertise and experience. However, we find ourselves in a context where loyalty appears to outweigh merit. It is prudent to recognize that while we cannot control the decisions of those in power, we can control our responses and our own pursuit of virtue in leadership.
The Role of Intent
One must consider the motivations behind such appointments. While some may speculate about personal ambition or ulterior motives, it is essential to approach this with rationality. The Stoic perspective encourages us to examine the causes and effects of actions rather than assigning blame. Melania's engagement in international diplomacy, though seemingly unconventional, may stem from a desire to contribute positively to discussions on children and technology in conflict. Yet, we must ask: does this align with the virtues we hold dear?
The Implications for Multilateralism
The broader implications of this appointment reflect a potential shift in the United States' approach to international relations. The historical context shows a pattern of withdrawing from multilateral institutions, which raises concerns about the future of global cooperation. As Stoics, we understand that while we cannot dictate the actions of nations, we can advocate for justice and temperance in our own dealings. The credibility of institutions like the UN depends on the collective commitment to uphold principles of cooperation and mutual respect.
The Pursuit of Virtue
In observing the actions of the Trump administration, we note a tendency to prioritize self-interest over the common good. This is a reminder of the importance of virtue in leadership. The Stoic ideal emphasizes that true leadership is characterized by wisdom, justice, and a commitment to the welfare of all. It is within our control to embody these virtues in our own lives and to encourage others to do the same.
Conclusion
As we reflect on Melania Trump's role at the United Nations, let us remember that our focus should be on the principles that guide our actions and the virtues we aspire to uphold. While we may not have control over the decisions made at the highest levels of government, we do have the power to cultivate wisdom, courage, justice, and temperance in our own lives. In doing so, we contribute to a more just and virtuous society, regardless of the circumstances that surround us.
Source Body Text
“We ended DEI in America,” Donald Trump boasted during his State of the Union (SOTU) address on Tuesday. Unlike many things the president said in his excruciatingly long SOTU speech, this was actually half true. The Trump administration’s “war on woke” has pushed a lot of large companies and institutes to retreat from the diversity, equity and inclusion policies they used to pretend to be proud of. But while DEI may be dead, WTF hiring is very much alive. Being Wealthy, Trumpy, and/or Fox News-famous seem to be the only qualifications you need for success in Trump’s USA. See, for example, the entire Trump administration: a horrifying hodgepodge of unqualified sycophants. See also, hot off the press, Melania Trump’s new gig at the United Nations. It’s been announced that the first lady will lead a session of the United Nations security council on Monday titled Children, Technology, and Education in Conflict. It can’t be stressed enough that this is highly unusual. As the White House noted in a statement: “Mrs Trump’s leadership will mark the first time a sitting US first lady presides over the security council.” Back in precedented times, you see, you generally needed a qualification or two to lead the security council. Now, however, we’re squarely in the WTF economy: Melania is a Trump, ergo automatically qualified to do anything her little heart desires. What I want to know is why exactly Melania’s heart desires this. It’s true that the first lady likes a project and has kept herself very busy with her meme coins and coffee table books and film ventures. She has also made moves to position herself as a leading voice in the area of responsible technology for children and children in conflict. But, despite her pet projects, she’s kept a low profile as first lady and hasn’t seemed particularly enthused about public service or multilateralism. It is my working hypothesis that there are only two reasons a Trump ever does anything: money or malice. I’m not sure holding the gavel at Monday’s security council session is particularly lucrative, so file this one under “malice”. Foisting Melania on the security council as the US assumes the body’s rotating monthly presidency sends a clear message to the world about just how seriously the Trump administration takes the UN. It feels like an attempt to undermine the credibility of the UN and multilateralism more broadly. Trump certainly hasn’t tried to hide his contempt for independent intergovernmental institutions. In his first term as president, he withdrew from the World Health Organization (WHO). This was reversed by Joe Biden and then that reversal was overturned by Trump last year: the US formally left the WHO at the end of last month. In January, the president also signed an executive order withdrawing the US from 66 international organizations, agencies and commissions, including the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Trump justified this by saying the organizations’ interests run “contrary” to US interests. In other words, they commit the cardinal sin of not doing everything he says. “The symbolism is unequivocal,” Daniel Forti, head of UN affairs at the International Crisis Group, told NPR about this retreat from the UN system. “It’s that the US really wants to dictate its own terms to the rest of the multilateral system and wants to work with the UN in a way where it really sets the agenda.” The US is certainly setting the agenda in Gaza, with Trump’s so-called Board of Peace. The US owes more than $4bn in UN arrears; it has only paid $160m of this but, according to a recent announcement by Trump, $10bn will be transferred from the US government to the “Board of Peace”, an international body chaired by the president and full of his lackeys and family – including son-in-law Jared Kushner, who is on the founding executive board. Rather than bring any sort of relief to Gaza, the board seems like a vehicle for rampant profiteering. And a very exciting personal opportunity for Kushner, who has waxed lyrical about Gaza’s valuable waterfront property. Trump has also made it clear that he thinks the board is “going to go far beyond Gaza”. While he has said “we’re working in conjunction with the United Nations,” a number of diplomats worry it will morph into an alternative forum to the UN: one which is quite explicitly controlled by the US. All of which must be very exciting for our first lady, who is clearly keen to try her hand at international diplomacy. Perhaps, after her valuable work experience stint at the United Nations on Monday, Melania will also find herself a nice little role on the Board of Peace. And maybe Ivanka Trump, who the president once thought about installing as the head of the World Bank, will also return to public life. Whatever happens, I think we can all agree that we’re terribly lucky to have such a talented ruling family. Fifa, I hope you’re paying attention; time to give Melania her own peace prize, don’t you think? EU opens up funding to guarantee abortion rights across bloc Women in EU member states with near-total abortion bans, such as Poland, will be given help to access legal and safe abortions elsewhere, it was announced on Thursday. This is being hailed as a “victory for women” and was the result of the My Voice, My Choice citizens’ initiative. Nice to see democracy working properly for a change! Tennessee Republicans try to introduce the death penalty for abortions A number of Republican state lawmakers, including representative Monty Fritts, who is also running for governor, recently introduced an amendment to the criminal code which would classify abortion as “homicide of an unborn child”, punishable by life imprisonment or death by lethal injection. It looks like this bill will stall indefinitely, but the fact that it was even introduced shows just how far right the Overton window has shifted. Lindsey Graham accused of sexism towards Danish prime minister According to the Danish newspaper Berlingske, via the Daily Beast, the South Carolina senator called Mette Frederiksen “little lady” as he looked her “straight in the eye” and “sneered” during an exchange. The side part is back Big news for geriatric millennials like me. The BBC seems to think ‘free Palestine’ is more offensive than the N-word Very disturbing to see what BBC decided to edit out of the British Academy Film Awards and what they decided to keep in. Two women arrested in Uganda for allegedly kissing in public It’s not clear if the women will be formally charged, but if they are they could face a life sentence. Back in 2023, Uganda passed one of the harshest anti-LGBTQ+ laws in the world. It includes life imprisonment for same-sex relationships and the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality”. Palestinian journalists raped in Israeli prisons, report alleges Almost 60 Palestinian journalists detained in Israeli prisons have been beaten, starved and subjected to sexual violence, including rape, a report by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) alleges. Another CPJ report, released on Wednesday, found Israel is responsible for two-thirds of a record 129 press killings in 2025 and to blame for 81% of “intentionally targeted” journalist killings. Cardiovascular disease rising among women Nearly six in the 10 women in the US will have some sort of cardiovascular diseases by 2050, according to projections outlined in a new statement from the American Heart Association. In more positive news, rates of high cholesterol are expected to decline among nearly all groups of women. The week in pawtriarchy Moooove over, Moo Deng, the world has a new favourite celebrity zoo animal. Punch, a Japanese macaque, has shot to international prominence after being abandoned by his mother and growing attached to a stuffed orangutan toy from Ikea. It would seem that little Punch is now has a lot of (pri)mates and is generally thriving. So is Ikea, which is now selling out of its Djungelskog orangutan soft toy. Opportunistic resellers are also jacking up the stuffed toy’s price and putting it on eBay. Capitalism really is bananas. Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist