A Stoic SaysA Stoic Says logo - Daily Stoic philosophy and wisdom

June 23, 2026

In Iran, Trump’s victory claims only deepened a self-made catastrophe | Sidney Blumenthal

In his report, Sidney Blumenthal critiques Donald Trump's handling of the Iran war, highlighting Trump's repeated proclamations of victory despite the war's disastrous outcomes. Key figures include Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, all of whom are portrayed as complicit in the failed strategy. Blumenthal concludes that Trump's triumphalism not only deepened the crisis in Iran but also undermined U.S. credibility and alliances, ultimately portraying Trump as a president who lost a war of aggression without justification. The analysis underscores the historical implications of Trump's actions, likening his failures to those of past leaders who struggled with the consequences of military defeat.

Thumbnail for In Iran, Trump’s victory claims only deepened a self-made catastrophe | Sidney Blumenthal

Stoic Response

War & ConflictPolitics & GovernanceJustice & Rights

Understanding the Tension of Triumph and Defeat

In the critique of Donald Trump's handling of the Iran war, a profound tension emerges: the stark contrast between proclaimed victories and the grim realities of failure. Blumenthal asserts, “Trump’s triumphalism only deepened the bitterness and anger that has followed his eventual loss.” This encapsulates the essence of the critique—how the denial of failure can exacerbate crises rather than resolve them.

Recognize What You Can Control

The Stoic philosophy teaches us to distinguish between what lies within our control and what does not. In the context of political leadership and international relations, recognize that you cannot control the actions of others or the outcomes of complex situations. Instead, focus on your responses and decisions.

Action Steps:

  • Accept Reality: Acknowledge the truth of your situation, no matter how uncomfortable. Denial only prolongs suffering.
  • Reflect on Your Role: Consider how your actions contribute to the circumstances at hand. What can you learn from the situation?

Cultivate Inner Resilience

In times of turmoil, it is essential to cultivate a sense of inner resilience. This involves maintaining clarity of thought and emotional stability, regardless of external chaos. Trump’s failure to accept the reality of his situation serves as a cautionary tale.

Action Steps:

  • Practice Mindfulness: Engage in daily reflection to assess your thoughts and feelings. This will help you maintain perspective amidst external noise.
  • Embrace Humility: Recognize that mistakes are part of the human experience. Use them as opportunities for growth rather than sources of shame.

Act with Integrity

In every decision, act with integrity. The Stoics believed that virtue is the highest good. This means aligning your actions with your values, even when the outcome is uncertain.

Action Steps:

  • Prioritize Ethical Leadership: Make decisions that reflect your principles, even when under pressure. This builds trust and credibility.
  • Communicate Transparently: Be honest about challenges and setbacks. This fosters a culture of accountability and learning.

Focus on Meaningful Change

Lastly, direct your efforts towards meaningful change. Instead of getting lost in the noise of triumphalism, aim to create a positive impact based on rational assessment and ethical considerations.

Action Steps:

  • Set Realistic Goals: Establish clear, achievable objectives that align with your values and the realities of your situation.
  • Engage Others: Collaborate with those who share your vision for change. Collective efforts often yield more significant results than isolated actions.

In conclusion, navigate the complexities of leadership and life by adhering to the Stoic dichotomy of control. By focusing on what you can control, cultivating resilience, acting with integrity, and pursuing meaningful change, you can rise above the chaos and contribute positively to the world around you.

Article Rewritten Through Stoic Lens

Journal of Marcus Aurelius: Reflections on the Nature of Leadership and Conflict

The Nature of Victory and Defeat

In the affairs of men, I observe a tendency to declare victory amidst chaos. Such proclamations, as seen in the recent conflict involving the Persians, reveal a profound misunderstanding of true triumph. One may proclaim, “We have won!” yet the reality is often far removed from such assertions. The wise leader understands that victory is not merely a matter of words but is rooted in the stability and harmony of the state.

Acceptance of the Order of Things

It is essential to accept the unfolding of events as part of the greater tapestry of existence. The actions of leaders, such as those surrounding the recent war, illustrate the folly of hubris. The Secretary of State and his companions, in their pursuit of glory, have overlooked the wisdom that lies in humility and the acceptance of nature’s course. The world is not swayed by mere declarations; it is shaped by actions and their consequences.

The Fallibility of Leadership

In moments of crisis, leaders often seek to deflect blame rather than confront their own shortcomings. This behavior, as exhibited by those in power, serves only to deepen the wounds of conflict. When one assigns fault to others, they reveal their own weaknesses. True virtue lies in taking responsibility and learning from the trials we face.

The Illusion of Control

The belief that one can exert absolute control over complex situations is a delusion. The recent conflict has illustrated this truth vividly. The leaders involved have confused tactical maneuvers with strategic foresight, leading to a series of miscalculations that have only served to embolden adversaries. It is a reminder that power is transient and that the illusion of control can lead to greater calamity.

The Consequences of Hubris

The leaders who have engaged in this conflict must now reckon with the consequences of their actions. The elevation of the Iranian regime as a regional power is a testament to the dangers of overreach and arrogance. In seeking to impose their will, they have inadvertently strengthened their adversaries. This serves as a cautionary tale for all who wield power: the greater the ambition, the more vigilant one must be against the pitfalls of pride.

The Importance of Integrity

As I reflect on the behavior of these leaders, I am reminded of the importance of integrity and the need for leaders to remain true to their principles. The abandonment of allies and the betrayal of trust can lead to long-lasting repercussions. A leader must cultivate relationships based on mutual respect and understanding, for these bonds are the foundation of a stable and prosperous society.

The Wisdom of Historical Reflection

History teaches us that leaders who engage in conflict without just cause often find themselves in a quagmire from which there is no easy escape. The lessons of past rulers, who have struggled under the weight of their own decisions, should serve as a guide. To govern wisely is to learn from the failures of those who came before us, to recognize the limits of power, and to act with prudence.

Embracing the Present Moment

In the face of adversity, it is vital to remain present and to focus on what can be controlled. The distractions of past grievances or future uncertainties can cloud judgment. Instead, let us cultivate a spirit of resilience and acceptance, recognizing that every challenge is an opportunity for growth and virtue.

Conclusion: The Path Forward

As I conclude this reflection, I am reminded that the path of leadership is fraught with challenges, yet it is also rich with opportunities for wisdom and virtue. Let us strive to lead with integrity, to accept the natural order of events, and to learn from the trials we encounter. In doing so, we may find a deeper sense of purpose and fulfillment in our roles as stewards of the common good.

Source Body Text

Before Donald Trump finally surrendered in his Iran war, he declared victory several dozen times, including on day eight– “We’ve already won!” – day 10 – “The war is very complete”– day 12, proclaiming he had won five times in 13 seconds – “We’ve won, let me say we’ve won. You know, you never like to say too early you won, we won, we won the bet in the first hour it was over”– and day 39 –“Total and complete victory, 100%. No question about it”– and claimed a deal to end the war was just around the corner 38 times. The first time he raised the prospect of peace, on day 24, he said the two sides had reached “almost all points of agreement”. Trump boldly affixed his signature with a sharpie to the Memorandum Of Understanding on day 110, 17 June, at the Palace of Versailles, where the ruinous treaty concluding the first world war was signed. He seemed oblivious to the historical symbolism of the place, but bedazzled by its gold. “Versailles is not gold leaf – Versailles is the real deal,” he remarked. At a press conference beforehand, secretary of state Marco Rubio stood stone-faced as an Easter Island statue, perhaps hoping nobody would notice him, but still tainted with the war by his presence. Trump said about his absent vice-president, who was queasy about the whole venture but has now been assigned the task of defending it: “If it doesn’t work out, I’m blaming JD.” The next day, Vance insisted the war was a “win” and falsely stated that lifting oil sanctions is “not a new benefit” for Iran. Trump, who invariably chooses a fall guy for his own failures, apparently does not wish to have anyone become his successor. Vance, for his part, promptly pointed at Israel, where Trump’s MOU is universally excoriated, as the fall guy. “If I was in the cabinet of the Israeli government,” Vance said, “I might not be attacking the only powerful ally that I have anywhere left in the entire world.” Vance has been delegated to drink from the poisoned chalice. Welcome to Jonestown. That day, 18 June, Israel Hayom, the rightwing newspaper that is a mouthpiece for prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and is published by Miriam Adelson, who gave more than $100m to the 2024 Trump campaign, ran a lead editorial addressed to Trump: “Mr. President, you have gravely harmed the human interests of the enlightened world, and you may be remembered forever as the president who brought about America’s humiliation. You betrayed us, the Israelis. And in a single moment, the contempt you once faced suddenly seems so justified and logical.” Netanyahu, who delivered his fate into Trump’s hands, forgot that Trump abandoned even his mentor, the mob lawyer Roy Cohn, in the end. Trump lost his war on day one. In fact, Iran first effectively closed the strait of Hormuz following US and Israeli airstrikes that day and formally closed it two days later, achieving asymmetric strategic superiority through control over a crucial spigot of the global economy. On day 43, 11 April, Trump tweeted: “The United States has completely destroyed Iran’s Military, including their entire Navy and Air Force, and everything else.” Trump could not distinguish between tactics and strategy. He confused bombs and bombast with the mission, which eluded him. The more he bombed, the more he lost the plot. Without any strategic comprehension, Trump’s triumphalism only deepened the bitterness and anger that has followed his eventual loss. In brief, he elevated the Iranian regime into a regional hegemon and a power in the world economy; persuaded the Gulf states that the US is an unreliable ally that could not shield them; increased the influence everywhere of China; condemned Israel after Netanyahu hustled Trump into a fiasco that other presidents had carefully avoided; further alienated our European allies that prudently distanced themselves; drastically wasted US military power; and shattered US prestige. By the time he had finished, nobody on any side believed Trump should be taken at his word. The exercise of Trump exposing himself yet again as a mountebank is redundant, but now catastrophic with the whole world watching. What Trump succeeded in obliterating was any rationale he offered for going to war. He had claimed he already accomplished regime change in Iran amidst his dire threats. On day 39, 7 April, he tweeted: “A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will. However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalized minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS?” Trump provided his own refutation on day 110, 16 June, piling on praise for the Iranian regime that had consolidated as a theocratic military dictatorship: “You talk about regime change. I never cared about regime change. It [was] never a part … And we’re dealing with people that I think are very rational people. They were nice to deal with. They were strong people, smart people. I think actually they’re smarter than the first and second group, but they’re not radicalized and they’re, you know, looking to help their country.” Trump is in a class of his own as an American president in launching a war of aggression without a casus belli, a direct offensive provocation, and losing it in short order. Other presidents haunted by the shadow of defeat in war knew it would discredit them. Two days after John F Kennedy’s assassination, on 24 November 1963, Lyndon Johnson told the US ambassador to South Vietnam, Henry Cabot Lodge Jr: “I am not going to lose Vietnam.” Three years later, Johnson confessed privately: “I just can’t be the architect of surrender.” “I won’t be the first American president to lose a war,” he told undersecretary of state George Ball. President Richard Nixon uttered virtually the same words. “I’m not going to be the first American president to lose a war,” he told his aides in October 1969. Both Johnson and Nixon were undone as they struggled with their inability to end a war they did not begin but which they escalated, as the Pentagon Papers revealed, through vain attempts to achieve what Nixon called “peace with honor”. Leaders in democracies that lose wars inevitably lose office. There is no case anywhere of a democratic leader politically surviving the loss of a war. (George W Bush was re-elected in 2004 before the defeat materialized in Iraq and Afghanistan, which by 2016 had broken the Reagan-Bush era of the Republican party and greatly contributed to the rise of Trump.) Despots historically have retained power in the aftermath of defeat only through ruthless repression, coercive control of media and scapegoating, which makes the revolt against them more explosive when it comes. On day 107, 14 June, Trump’s birthday, Trump had announced the sketchy MOU as “complete”. “Congratulations to all!” he crowed. In a boon to Iran, Trump waived oil export sanctions, opened access to tens of billions of dollars in frozen assets, and committed to a mysteriously funded $300bn “Reconstruction Plan” that might have unspecified side deals, while entering into 60 days of negotiations to limit Iran’s nuclear program more than eight years after he withdrew from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action negotiated under President Obama in which Iran pledged not to develop a nuclear weapon. Trump called it a “horrible, one-sided deal that should have never, ever been made”. On that day, his 80th birthday, Trump staged matches of the Ultimate Fighting Championship on the South Lawn of the White House in a cage under his gargantuan “claw” as though he had won the war and the fighters victorious in the ring represented his strength. His circus was the opening act of his culture of defeat and its denial. When asked on day 111, 18 June, by an Axios reporter what insight the war had revealed to him about “the limits of his ability to exert power”, Trump replied: “There are no limits. I haven’t learned that lesson yet. I know there are, but there are no limits.” He claimed that the Iranian signing of the MOU was “probably unconditional surrender”. Trump had called for Iran’s “unconditional surrender” on day seven, 6 March. On 18 June, Trump also declared victory over the algae blooms in the Reflecting Pool that had turned it green after he granted two no-bid contracts for $16m to a firm that previously performed pool work at a Trump golf club but had no history of federal contracting and a campaign contributor and Mar-a-Lago club member who was twice criminally convicted. The Interior Department tweeted: “The Reflecting Pool water is crystal clear, and our National Park Service team is now vacuuming up the dead algae resting on the bottom of some parts of the Reflecting Pool – just like the destroyed Iranian Navy resting on the bottom of the Persian Gulf.” Trump said the pool would “probably” have to be drained again and accused “Radical Left Lunatics” of sabotaging his project with a knife and chemicals, though he presented no evidence. He tweeted about “terrible vandals” and “serious crimes… Years in jail!” On 19 June, the Park police arrested a 67 year-old former Olympic cyclist on a misdemeanor charge of destroying government property for reaching into the pool to touch the “American flag blue” peeling paint. He was released within hours – day 113, another quagmire, another defeat. In 40 AD, the Emperor Caligula, notorious for his inability to “control his natural cruelty and viciousness”, as well as his “gluttony and adultery”. according to the historian Suetonius, marched his legions to the shore of the English Channel to invade Britain, where he suddenly ordered his soldiers to gather seashells as the “spoils” of war. “As a monument of his victory he erected a lofty tower, from which lights were to shine at night to guide the course of ships,” and staged a return to Rome “on his birthday in an ovation”. Trump is now caught in his Caligula Trap from which he cannot extract himself. Mocking his self-congratulatory language, Marjorie Taylor Greene, the former Republican member of Congress and Maga queen, posted on the day Trump signed the MOU: “Congratulations to all for almost achieving peace to the war that is not a war, spending hundreds of billions of US tax dollars again for another foreign war after we voted no … This, apparently, is what winning looks like.” Sidney Blumenthal, former senior adviser to President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, has published three books of a projected five-volume political life of Abraham Lincoln: A Self-Made Man, Wrestling With His Angel and All the Powers of Earth. He is a Guardian US columnist and co-host of the Court of History podcast