A Stoic SaysA Stoic Says logo - Daily Stoic philosophy and wisdom

June 25, 2026

To protect the Iran peace talks, will Trump finally restrain Netanyahu? | Mohamad Bazzi

In a recent report, Mohamad Bazzi discusses tensions between the Trump administration and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regarding the Iran peace talks. JD Vance, speaking for Trump, criticized Israeli leaders for undermining U.S. efforts to negotiate a ceasefire with Iran, suggesting that Netanyahu's actions could jeopardize U.S. support. Trump has expressed frustration with Netanyahu's obstinacy, warning that continued Israeli aggression in Lebanon could derail potential agreements with Iran. Bazzi concludes that the effectiveness of Trump's diplomacy with Iran hinges on whether he will take concrete steps to restrain Netanyahu's military actions.

Thumbnail for To protect the Iran peace talks, will Trump finally restrain Netanyahu? | Mohamad Bazzi

Stoic Response

Politics & GovernanceWar & ConflictJustice & Rights

Reflections on the Tensions of Power and Control

As I ponder the recent discourse surrounding the tensions between the Trump administration and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, I am reminded of the Stoic principle of distinguishing between what is within our control and what is not. The article reveals a critical tension: the struggle for influence in international diplomacy amidst personal conflicts and national interests.

Understanding the Tension

The chief tension lies in the conflicting priorities of powerful leaders. JD Vance's assertion, “If I was in the cabinet of the Israeli government, I might not be attacking the only powerful ally that I have anywhere left,” highlights the precarious balance of power and the need for cooperation. This tension is exacerbated by Netanyahu's actions, which threaten to undermine U.S. diplomatic efforts with Iran. The situation illustrates the complexities of leadership, where personal egos and national strategies clash, impacting the lives of countless individuals.

Recognize What You Can Control

In the face of such turmoil, it is essential to recognize what lies within your control. You cannot dictate the actions of world leaders or the outcomes of international negotiations. However, you can control your responses, your thoughts, and your actions. Reflect on the words of Epictetus: “It’s not what happens to you, but how you react to it that matters.”

Guidance for Action

  1. Focus on Your Sphere of Influence
    Direct your energy toward areas where you can effect change. Engage in discussions that promote understanding and peace. Advocate for responsible governance and ethical leadership within your community.

  2. Practice Emotional Resilience
    When faced with distressing news, cultivate a mindset of detachment. Recognize that while you may feel the weight of the world's problems, your emotional well-being should not be dictated by external events.

  3. Cultivate Inner Virtue
    Strive for personal integrity and virtue. As you witness the actions of leaders, remind yourself that your character is defined by your choices, not by the chaos around you.

  4. Encourage Constructive Dialogue
    In conversations about global issues, promote a spirit of collaboration rather than conflict. Seek common ground, and encourage others to consider the broader implications of their actions.

Conclusion: The Path Forward

In navigating the complexities of international relations and the accompanying tensions, remember the Stoic principle of focusing on what you can control. While the actions of leaders may seem overwhelming, your response can foster a ripple effect of positive change. As you reflect on these tensions, strive to embody the virtues of wisdom, courage, and temperance, guiding others toward a more harmonious existence.

Article Rewritten Through Stoic Lens

A Stoic Reflection on Diplomatic Tensions

In the realm of international relations, we often witness the interplay of power, virtue, and human folly. The recent discourse surrounding the Trump administration and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regarding the Iran peace talks serves as a case study in the complexities of leadership and the virtues of wisdom, courage, justice, and temperance.

The Nature of Criticism

On June 18, JD Vance, representing the administration, articulated a perspective that reflects the Stoic principle of rational assessment. He highlighted the importance of maintaining alliances, particularly in times of conflict. Vance’s assertion that attacking a powerful ally is counterproductive aligns with the Stoic understanding that one should focus on what is within their control—namely, the cultivation of relationships based on mutual respect and benefit.

Vance’s remarks underscore a fundamental truth: the reliance on American support has been a cornerstone of Israel's defense strategy. The Stoic philosopher would remind us that while external circumstances may be challenging, our response to them is what truly defines our character.

Understanding Obstinacy

The tensions between Trump and Netanyahu reveal a deeper issue: the nature of obstinacy in leadership. Trump’s frustrations with Netanyahu's approach to ceasefire negotiations reflect a common human tendency to resist change. However, a Stoic perspective invites us to examine the causes of such resistance. Is it rooted in a desire for power, a fear of vulnerability, or a misalignment of values?

The Stoic approach encourages us to reflect on the consequences of actions rather than assigning blame. Netanyahu's actions may be seen as a defense of national interests, yet the broader implications—potentially jeopardizing U.S. support—must be weighed with rationality.

The Illusion of Control

As the situation evolves, it is essential to recognize what is within our control. Trump’s ability to influence Netanyahu's military actions is limited by the latter’s sovereignty and strategic calculations. The Stoic philosopher would advise focusing on one’s own decisions and actions, rather than lamenting the obstinacy of others.

The potential consequences of continued Israeli aggression in Lebanon serve as a reminder that while we may strive for peace, external factors often complicate our ambitions. The Stoic mindset encourages acceptance of these realities while maintaining a commitment to virtue and justice.

The Role of Diplomacy

The unfolding narrative surrounding the U.S.-Iran negotiations illustrates the delicate balance of diplomacy. The Stoic would argue that true diplomacy requires wisdom and temperance—qualities that allow leaders to navigate complex situations without succumbing to emotional reactions.

Trump’s reported frustrations with Netanyahu’s approach highlight the necessity for courage in leadership. It is not merely about expressing dissatisfaction; it is about taking decisive action when principles of justice and peace are at stake. The question remains: Will he act to restrain actions that undermine a broader peace?

Conclusion: A Call to Virtue

In conclusion, the tensions between the Trump administration and Israeli leadership serve as a poignant reminder of the virtues that should guide our actions in the realm of international relations. The Stoic perspective urges us to cultivate wisdom, courage, justice, and temperance in our dealings with others.

As we reflect on these events, let us strive to focus on what we can control—our own responses, our commitment to virtue, and our pursuit of justice. In doing so, we may contribute to a more harmonious world, where the complexities of human nature are met with reasoned understanding and principled action.

Source Body Text

On 18 June, JD Vance stood in the White House press briefing room and tore into Israeli critics of the Iran deal that his boss, Donald Trump, had signed the previous day. The vice-president argued that Trump was the only world leader who was still sympathetic to Israel after nearly three years of wars and destruction across the Middle East. “If I was in the cabinet of the Israeli government,” Vance said, “I might not be attacking the only powerful ally that I have anywhere left ‌in the entire world.” Vance also pointed out that, during the recent US-Israeli war on Iran, two-thirds of the defensive weapons used to protect Israel from Iranian retaliation “have been built by American hands and paid for by American tax dollars”. Vance publicly scolded Israel’s leaders in a way they have rarely been criticized by a high-level US politician. And while Vance did not directly target his criticism at the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, the subtext was clear: the Trump administration is willing to call out the Israeli leader for sabotaging ceasefire agreements so that he could prolong regional wars and maintain power. Over the past few weeks, Trump and several of his advisers have told reporters (or strategically leaked) that the president has had enough of Netanyahu’s obstinacy and resistance to a ceasefire with Iran. In a recent phone call, Trump reportedly called the Israeli premier “fucking crazy” – and the president himself later told Axios that Netanyahu “has no fucking judgment”. On 7 June, Trump told the Financial Times that Netanyahu had no choice but to accept the ceasefire: “I call all the shots. He doesn’t call the shots.” Trump and his aides played this game before, leaking their supposed displeasure with Netanyahu but not following through by withholding the US weapons that enabled Israel to continue its wars in Gaza, Lebanon and elsewhere. After the October 2023 Hamas attacks, Israel received tens of billions of dollars in US military assistance and unconditional political support, starting with Joe Biden’s administration and continuing under Trump. With no limits imposed by either administration, Netanyahu concluded that Israel can bomb virtually anyone in the Middle East. By the fall of 2025, Israel had unleashed a genocidal war on Gaza and also attacked Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Qatar. Will Trump finally restrain Netanyahu? Will the president prevent his ally from undermining US negotiations with Iran, which started last week and are supposed to conclude in 60 days with a larger deal on Tehran’s nuclear program? The test will come in Lebanon, where Israel has occupied a swath of the south and continued its attacks despite multiple ceasefires negotiated with the Lebanese government and Hezbollah, a militia allied with Iran. US intelligence agencies recently warned Trump that Netanyahu will probably try to sabotage a peace agreement with Iran’s leaders. Iran has made clear that the latest ceasefire must apply on all fronts, including Lebanon, and Tehran has pushed the Trump administration to pressure Israel to withdraw its troops from Lebanese territory. Otherwise, Iranian leaders threatened to walk away from negotiations and once again close the strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of global oil and liquid gas supplies passed before Iran shut it during the war. Trump celebrated reopening the waterway as one of the biggest accomplishments of the interim deal he signed with Tehran last week. Trump has more incentive to impose limits on Netanyahu, after the Israeli leader spent months persuading Trump to launch a war aimed at toppling the Iranian regime. But the gambit backfired as Iran withstood weeks of severe bombing by the US and Israel, two of the world’s most powerful militaries. Tehran also retaliated with missile strikes against American military bases across the Middle East; it targeted the energy infrastructure of its Gulf neighbors; and it threatened to trigger a global recession by closing the strait of Hormuz. Trump doesn’t like to admit any failure, and he may eventually blame his botched Iran war on Netanyahu. But to do so, Trump needs an agreement with Tehran that allows him to declare victory and move on from the conflict. And that deal will be at risk as long as Israel continues its war in Lebanon. Once the joint US-Israeli attack on Iran started on 28 February, the conflict quickly expanded to Lebanon, where Israel and Hezbollah have fought multiple wars. On 2 March, in retaliation for the killing of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Hezbollah fired a volley of rockets at Israel. That led to a massive Israeli bombing campaign and a ground invasion that forcibly displaced more than 1 million people, a fifth of Lebanon’s population. After the US and Iran reached an initial ceasefire on 7 April, Pakistan’s prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif, who helped negotiate the deal, insisted it would include Lebanon. But Netanyahu quickly declared that Israel was not bound by that agreement. On 8 April, Israel carried out one of the worst mass killings in Lebanon’s history, using dozens of warplanes to bomb more than 100 targets across the country in the span of 10 minutes. The attacks killed at least 350 people and wounded more than 1,200. The Israeli military claimed it had targeted Hezbollah “command centers” in an operation it named “Eternal Darkness”. Israeli leaders openly threatened to replicate their Gaza playbook in southern Lebanon: intense aerial bombardment that leads to the large-scale displacement of civilians; the destruction of civilian infrastructure, including schools and hospitals; and the systematic razing of housing in Lebanese towns near Israel’s border, to make way for a so-called “security zone” occupied by the Israeli military. In late March, the defense minister, Israel Katz, said his troops would destroy “all houses” in Lebanese border villages “in accordance with the model used in Rafah and Beit Hanoun in Gaza”. The US and other western powers said little about Israel’s threats to repeat the war crimes it had committed in Gaza. But Trump began to focus more closely on Lebanon when Israel’s continued attacks and fighting with Hezbollah endangered the wider ceasefire with Iran. On 1 June, Trump had an expletive-filled call with Netanyahu, in which he berated the Israeli premier for expanding attacks in southern Lebanon and threatening to bomb Beirut. “You’re fucking crazy. You’d be in prison if it weren’t for me,” Trump reportedly told Netanyahu, after Iran threatened to abandon negotiations with the US. “I’m saving your ass. Everybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this.” Two weeks later, speaking at a G7 summit, Trump publicly criticized Israel’s brutal military tactics in Lebanon, which have killed more than 4,100 people since early March. “Too many people have been killed,” Trump said. “You don’t have to knock down an apartment house every time you’re looking for somebody, because there are a lot of people in those apartment houses, and they’re not all Hezbollah.” The question now is whether Trump is willing to back up his anger at Netanyahu with action – by threatening to withhold US weapons and other support unless Israel withdraws from Lebanon. That could determine the fate of Trump’s elusive peace deal with Iran. Mohamad Bazzi is a Guardian US columnist. He is also director of the Center for Near Eastern Studies and a journalism professor at New York University