August 8, 2026
Rest assured, the new CDC director thinks ‘abortion surveillance’ is essential | Arwa Mahdawi
Executive Summary
Dr. Erica Schwartz has been confirmed as the new director of the CDC, marking a significant leadership change after nearly a year without a permanent head. During her confirmation, Schwartz emphasized the importance of abortion surveillance, committing to improve data collection on abortions amid concerns about growing restrictions and misinformation. While her background suggests a commitment to public health, her statements have raised alarms regarding the potential politicization of health data and its implications for reproductive rights in the U.S. Leaders should monitor the evolving landscape of public health policy and its intersection with reproductive rights.

Stoic Response
Stoic Field Manual Entry: Navigating Leadership Changes in Public Health
Executive Summary
Dr. Erica Schwartz's confirmation as the new director of the CDC presents a pivotal moment in public health leadership, intersecting with complex issues such as abortion surveillance and reproductive rights. This entry will clarify what is within our power, what constitutes opinion, and the virtuous actions demanded in response to these developments.
What Is Within Our Power
- Personal Response: We can choose how to respond to changes in leadership and policy.
- Advocacy: Engage in advocacy for transparent and ethical data practices regarding reproductive health.
- Awareness: Stay informed on public health policies and their implications for individual rights.
What Is Opinion
- Political Views: Opinions regarding Schwartz's commitment to science versus political pressures are subjective.
- Public Perception: Interpretations of her statements on abortion surveillance vary widely among stakeholders.
- Media Narratives: Different media outlets may frame Schwartz's confirmation and its implications in contrasting ways, reflecting their biases.
What Action Virtue Demands
- Critical Engagement: Analyze Schwartz's statements and actions critically, distinguishing between rhetoric and reality.
- Promote Integrity: Advocate for the CDC to prioritize public health over political agendas, ensuring data collection serves the public good.
- Support Reproductive Rights: Stand with organizations and individuals working to protect reproductive rights and health privacy.
- Foster Dialogue: Encourage open discussions about the implications of surveillance in healthcare, emphasizing patient autonomy.
Conclusion
In navigating the complexities of public health leadership and policy, we must remain vigilant and proactive. By focusing on what is within our control, recognizing subjective opinions, and committing to virtuous actions, we can contribute to a more ethical and just public health landscape.
Article Rewritten Through Stoic Lens
The Stoic Perspective on Leadership and Public Health
The Dichotomy of Control
In the unfolding events surrounding the confirmation of Dr. Erica Schwartz as the new director of the CDC, we must first recognize what lies within our control and what does not. The appointment of a leader is determined by external forces—political bodies and public opinion. However, how we respond to these changes is entirely within our grasp.
Embracing Change with Discipline
Dr. Schwartz's confirmation marks a significant shift in leadership. While we cannot control who is appointed, we can control our reactions. Let us practice discipline in our judgment. Schwartz has pledged to uphold scientific integrity while navigating a politically charged environment. This presents an opportunity for us to reflect on our own commitment to truth and reason, regardless of external pressures.
Judgment Amidst Uncertainty
During her confirmation, Schwartz emphasized the importance of abortion surveillance, a topic fraught with emotional and political implications. Here, we confront a critical teaching moment: the need for sound judgment. While some may view her commitment as alarming, we must remember that our interpretations are subject to our own biases. We can choose to seek clarity and understanding rather than succumb to fear or outrage.
Right Action in the Face of Controversy
The Nature of Data Collection
The conversation surrounding abortion data collection raises questions about privacy and the politicization of health information. Schwartz's commitment to accurate data collection is essential, yet we must ask ourselves: what is the right action in this context?
We cannot control the actions of lawmakers or the framing of issues by others. However, we can advocate for transparency and ethical practices in public health. This is our responsibility as informed citizens.
Responding to Alarmism with Rationality
When confronted with alarming rhetoric, such as the framing of abortions as "committed," we must exercise our Stoic principles. Instead of reacting with anger, we can choose to engage in constructive dialogue. This is an opportunity to practice rationality and to advocate for a discourse rooted in compassion and understanding.
The Role of Leadership in Public Health
Navigating Political Pressures
Dr. Schwartz's position is undoubtedly influenced by the political landscape. However, we must remember that her actions, while subjected to external pressures, are still her own. We can control our expectations of leadership and recognize that true leadership is about integrity and service to the public good.
The Importance of Vigilance
As leaders navigate the complexities of public health policy, we must remain vigilant. The evolving landscape of reproductive rights demands our attention and engagement. We cannot control the decisions made at the top, but we can control our advocacy for ethical practices and our support for those who uphold the principles of justice and care.
Conclusion: A Call to Stoic Action
In conclusion, the developments surrounding Dr. Schwartz's confirmation as CDC director serve as a profound reminder of the Stoic principles we must embody. Let us focus on what we can control: our thoughts, our actions, and our commitment to truth.
As we reflect on these events, may we cultivate a disciplined mind, exercise sound judgment, and pursue right action in all circumstances. In doing so, we honor the Stoic path and contribute to a more just and compassionate society.
Source Body Text
Robert F Kennedy Jr’s new cooking show isn’t the only big news out of the public health world this week. On Wednesday, Dr Erica Schwartz was confirmed by the US Senate as director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), making her the first Black woman to hold the position. This is the first time in almost a year that the agency has had a permanent leader; the previous director, Susan Monarez, only lasted 29 days before she was ousted for butting heads with RFK about US vaccine policies. Translation: she was a little too keen on following accepted science for the Trump administration. So is Schwartz an RFK-approved vaccine skeptic who thinks you can cure cancer by praying to trees? Surprisingly: no. Schwartz, who served as deputy surgeon general during Trump’s first term, actually has government experience and a public health background. During her confirmation hearing in July, she walked a careful tightrope when asked about her stance towards vaccines. Schwartz said she “will never betray the science” but also dodged questions about how she would handle pressure from Kennedy. But don’t breathe a sigh of relief quite yet. During that same confirmation hearing, Schwartz made some chilling remarks about abortion surveillance when quizzed on the issue by Missouri senator Josh Hawley, an anti-abortion lawmaker who wants to ban the abortion pill mifepristone nationwide. “The CDC collects data on abortions that are committed in the United States of America through a system called the Abortion Reporting System,” Hawley said when asking Schwartz if she would commit to collecting detailed data on abortions. “This system is voluntary, and so a number of states, not coincidentally large blue states, do not turn over any data, so that it’s difficult to get a picture of just how many abortions and under what circumstances are committed in this country. We do know the numbers are going, way up.” “Senator, you have my commitment,” Schwartz replied. “Abortion surveillance is absolutely a critical component of what the CDC is currently doing … I also want to make sure that certain states are not conflating emergency services and hiding abortions in that emergency services case definition,” she added. “We need to make sure we’re pulling out true abortions and making sure that we’re really having clear case definitions regarding abortions so the data is actually accurate.” “Tremendous,” Hawley replied. He seemed very happy with her response. If you are concerned about the growing criminalization of abortion and surveillance of pregnant women in the US, then absolutely nothing about this is tremendous. I’ve quoted the majority of the exchange between Hawley and Schwartz instead of paraphrasing it, because the choice of language is so alarming. First, look at the way in which Hawley frames the issue. He talks about abortions being committed: a loaded word which makes you think of murder. (Imagine it in another medical context: I’m having a mammogram committed tomorrow!) Then he insinuates that blue states are hiding abortion data for nefarious reasons. As it is, 44 states plus Washington DC have some form of mandated abortion reporting, according to the Guttmacher Institute, and there is no evidence that these states are hiding anything. New York is an outlier in that it only requires abortion reporting when a patient makes a request related to the disposition of the fetus’s remains. Which seems like a sensible policy that protects the privacy of people who have had abortions. Now look at Schwartz’s reply. Why would abortion surveillance be “a critical component” of what the CDC is doing? Data collection around abortions can serve legitimate purposes, sure, but isn’t it rather more important for the CDC to be, I dunno, controlling and preventing diseases? Her reference to “true abortions” (as opposed to fake ones?) and states “hiding abortions” is also worrying. Pregnant people are already dying preventable deaths because providers in states with abortion bans are terrified of treating them. This sort of language from the CDC director is going to make the situation even worse. Donald Trump has called Schwartz “a STAR”. If her exchange with Hawley is anything to go by, however, she seems to be yet another stooge: happy to facilitate the Trump administration’s anti-abortion agenda and politicization of public health. “Erica Schwartz’s testimony … should alarm everyone who believes private medical decisions belong to patients, not politicians,” Mini Timmaraju, the president and CEO of Reproductive Freedom for All, said in a statement. She added that, under the Trump administration, “abortion surveillance could be expanded or weaponized to collect more intrusive information, spread disinformation about reproductive health care, and support efforts to investigate or criminalize patients and providers.” As activists and experts have repeatedly said, overturning Roe v Wade was just the beginning of the new war on reproductive rights in the US – a war facilitated by an unprecedented network of surveillance technology. The convicted felon in the White House seems intent on treating every pregnant woman as a potential criminal. Todd Blanche pledged to roll back abortion access nationwide During a private call with religious groups, the acting attorney general, Todd Blanche, said efforts to reverse the Biden administration’s efforts to protect abortion were “taking longer than we want”. He seemed to suggest that the administration is working to restrict access to abortion pills and said: “We don’t have complete victory yet, but we will have victory, and victory will be soon, and it will be permanent.” Blanche has faced a rocky road to confirmation as attorney general. The bad news is that the government’s anti-abortion agenda will continue whether he gets the role or not. Arizona clergy who learn of child abuse in confessions aren’t required to report it That’s according to a new ruling by the state’s supreme court. No doubt they’ll soon be forced to report abortions, though! Anya Taylor-Joy has a theory about why method acting is associated with men “If you’ll notice, women don’t method act because we have things to take care of,” Taylor-Joy said in an interview promoting her new Apple TV show Lucky. (Which is extremely good, by the way). Back in 2024, Natalie Portman similarly described method acting as a “luxury women can’t afford”. She added: “I don’t think that children or partners would be very understanding of, you know, me making everyone call me ‘Jackie Kennedy’ all the time.” Sydney Towle, who shared cancer journey on TikTok, dies aged 26 More than a million people watched Towle navigate her cholangiocarcinoma, a rare cancer of the bile ducts. She raised awareness of the disease and built community. However, because the internet is often toxic, she was also accused by trolls of exaggerating or even faking her cancer. It even got to a point where Towle’s doctor had to confirm to the New York Times that she had stage 4 cancer. Miscarriages are surging in Gaza and births are declining This is not some unfortunate byproduct of war; it is by design. Last year, a UN report found that Israel’s systemic attacks on women’s healthcare in Gaza amount to “genocidal acts”. The report noted that Israel’s destruction of maternity wards, an IVF clinic, and control on essential supplies into Gaza “destroyed in part the reproductive capacity of Palestinians in Gaza as a group”. The week in pawtriarchy A cat called Toast Malone survived a fire that destroyed an apartment complex in Utah by hiding in a closet for three days. Toast did not get burned, and has now been reunited with their family. Now they’re the toast of the town. Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist