A Stoic SaysA Stoic Says logo - Daily Stoic philosophy and wisdom

August 22, 2026

Trump’s new attorney general poses a huge threat to abortion rights | Moira Donegan

Todd Blanche's confirmation as Attorney General poses a significant threat to abortion rights, particularly the distribution of the abortion pill mifepristone. Blanche has publicly committed to using the Justice Department's powers to enforce stricter regulations, potentially reviving the Comstock Act to ban the mailing of abortion pills and targeting states that protect abortion access. This shift is crucial as it could reverse advancements in reproductive health, pushing women toward unsafe alternatives, and signals a more aggressive anti-abortion agenda under the Trump administration. The implications of Blanche's actions could lead to widespread restrictions on reproductive rights, impacting women across the country.

Thumbnail for Trump’s new attorney general poses a huge threat to abortion rights | Moira Donegan

Stoic Response

Justice & RightsPolitics & GovernanceHealth & Wellness

Correspondence to a Roman Magistrate

From the Wisdom of Seneca and Musonius Rufus

To the Esteemed Magistrate,

In the tumult of our age, we find ourselves at a crossroads, much like the ancients faced in their struggles for virtue and justice. As you navigate the corridors of power, consider the words of Seneca: “The greatest obstacle to living is expectancy, which hangs upon tomorrow and loses today.” The confirmation of Todd Blanche as Attorney General represents not just a mere appointment but a grave threat to the liberties of women across our republic.

Statistic of Significance

In the wake of the Dobbs decision, the distribution of mifepristone has become a lifeline for countless women, enabling safe and effective termination of pregnancies. Since Roe was overturned, the availability of this medication has prevented a return to the perilous era of unsafe abortions, where “mass death” was a haunting reality. The very reliability of mifepristone stands as a testament to human ingenuity and compassion, yet now, under Blanche's influence, there looms a formidable threat to its continued accessibility.

Moral Stakes

The stakes are not merely political; they are profoundly moral. The potential revival of the Comstock Act and the targeting of states that protect reproductive rights signal a regression into a past where women's autonomy is stripped away. As Musonius Rufus taught, “It is not the man who has little, but he who desires more, that is poor.” In this case, the desire to control and limit the choices of women reflects a deep-seated poverty of spirit and understanding. The implications of Blanche’s actions could push women toward dangerous alternatives, undermining the very fabric of our society.

Practical Maxims

  1. Guard the Rights of the Vulnerable: A society is judged by how it treats its most vulnerable members. Uphold the autonomy of women as a reflection of our collective humanity.

  2. Preserve the Wisdom of Progress: Innovations in reproductive health should be celebrated and protected, not dismantled. Safeguard the advancements that have emerged from the crucible of hardship.

  3. Act with Integrity: In your role as a magistrate, let your choices reflect a commitment to justice and the well-being of all citizens, not the whims of partisan politics.

  4. Engage in Dialogue: Foster conversations that bridge divides, recognizing that true governance lies in understanding and compassion, not in division and control.

May your decisions be guided by wisdom and compassion, ensuring that the rights of all are preserved for generations to come.

In solidarity,

[Your Name]
A Fellow Seeker of Justice

Article Rewritten Through Stoic Lens

Journal Entry: Reflections on the Appointment of Todd Blanche

The Nature of Change

Today, I find myself contemplating the recent confirmation of Todd Blanche as Attorney General. In the grand tapestry of existence, such events remind us that the currents of power and influence are ever-shifting. It is a natural order, one that invites us to respond with wisdom rather than anxiety.

The Gift of Mifepristone

Mifepristone, a remarkable advancement in medical science, has transformed the landscape of reproductive health. It is a tool that allows for autonomy and safety, a contrast to the perilous methods of the past. The ease and reliability of this medication serve as a testament to human ingenuity. Yet, I recognize that the forces of opposition may seek to undermine this progress.

In the face of such challenges, I must remind myself that the essence of virtue lies not in the absence of obstacles, but in our response to them. The potential revival of outdated laws, such as the Comstock Act, may threaten access to this life-saving medication. However, I accept that this too is part of the human condition.

Virtue in Adversity

Blanche’s intentions to enforce stricter regulations on the distribution of mifepristone reveal a desire to impose limitations on freedom. Yet, I see this as an opportunity for virtue. In times of adversity, we are called to stand firm in our principles, to advocate for those who may be silenced. This is not merely a political struggle; it is a moral imperative.

As Blanche seeks to target states that protect reproductive rights, I am reminded that the strength of a society is measured by how it treats its most vulnerable members. The potential consequences of his actions may push women toward unsafe alternatives, but it is our duty to ensure that compassion and support prevail.

Acceptance of the Present

The political landscape is fraught with uncertainty, and the actions of those in power may often appear disheartening. Yet, I choose to accept the present moment as it is. The appointment of Blanche may signal a more aggressive agenda, but I will not succumb to despair. Instead, I will focus on what I can control: my own thoughts, my own actions, and my own commitment to justice.

The Path Forward

In the face of adversity, I must cultivate resilience. The struggle for reproductive rights is not merely a battle against an individual or a party; it is a broader fight for the dignity and autonomy of all individuals. As the winds of change blow, I will remain steadfast in my pursuit of virtue, advocating for the rights of others and fostering a community of support and understanding.

Conclusion: The Eternal Cycle

Life is a cycle of challenges and triumphs, a dance between creation and destruction. As I reflect on the implications of Todd Blanche’s confirmation, I am reminded that every action has its consequences, and every struggle can lead to growth. I will embrace this moment, not with fear, but with the resolve to act in accordance with my values. For in the acceptance of nature’s order, we find the strength to rise above and to seek the greater good.

Source Body Text

The abortion pill is a miracle. Mifepristone, then called RU-486, was synthesized by a French lab in the 1980s; in combination with misoprostol, commonly used as ulcer medication, it cuts off the body’s supply of progesterone, halts the development of a pregnancy, and incites contractions, which empty the uterus. The drug allows pregnancies to be terminated with a shocking degree of reliability and ease. Gone are the concoctions of ergot and Spanish Fly dispensed by 19th century midwives, which only sometimes worked to induce a miscarriage; gone are the backroom procedures of the pre-Roe US, when drunk, lascivious, incompetent or cruel providers wielded bent coat hangers in dirty rooms. The abortion pill is safe, effective and cheaper than ever. And since Dobbs, it’s everywhere: even if you live in a state with an abortion ban, you can get the pills shipped to your house in the mail. Since Roe was overturned, there has not been a return to the terror of mass death that marked the pre-Roe era of septic abortion wards, where women routinely found themselves maimed, sickened or killed. There’s exactly one reason why: because illegal abortions were largely unsafe without the pill, and they are extremely safe with it. So of course, the Trump administration and their allies on the American right are trying to get rid of it. And this month, they gained a powerful new ally when Todd Blanche, Donald Trump’s former personal lawyer and an anti-abortion zealot, was confirmed as attorney general. The vote, in which Blanche was confirmed by a margin of one along party lines, was conducted in the wee hours of the morning on 8 August. Maybe that’s because the Republicans who confirmed him didn’t want anyone to see what they were doing. Blanche has, after all, been shockingly subservient to Donald Trump, and seems poised to complete the president’s long-brewing transformation of the country’s chief law enforcement agency into a vehicle for score settling, personal vendettas, distributing favors to the administration’s friends and suppressing dissent from its political enemies. But perhaps most incendiary is what Blanche has said, publicly and privately, about how he intends to use the justice department and its vast array of oversight powers, legal prerogatives, and investigatory purview to curtail abortion access nationwide – and to shut down the life-saving distribution of mifepristone, in particular. In a call facilitated by the White House faith office just days before he was confirmed, Blanche reportedly told Christian conservative leaders that as attorney general, he would move more aggressively than his predecessor Pam Bondi to outlaw the mailing of mifepristone across state lines, and target the Democratic-controlled states that have protected abortion most effectively. Blanche, who was then the acting AG, told the religious group Intercessors for America that the justice department was working “so that the Dobbs decision becomes permanent in every single state.” “We don’t have complete victory yet,” Blanche said, “but we will have victory, and victory will be soon, and, and, and it will be permanent.” Exactly how Blanche intends to secure his victory over women’s freedom is unclear. But as AG, he has several paths at his disposal. His comments on the call prompted widespread speculation that Blanche could call for enforcement of the Comstock Act, a long-dormant law from 1873 that has been unenforced for years and has been partially repealed in the past. Anti-choice advocates say it could be used to legally ban the mailing of abortion pills, thus cutting off access for many women who live in states with bans. In 2022, the Biden justice department declared that medical providers could not be prosecuted under the Comstock Act for mailing abortion pills; as the attorney general, Blanche would have the power to reverse that decision. The Comstock Act’s application would be particularly significant, as it could be used to halt virtually all commercial traffic in abortion pills – not only mifepristone, but also misoprostol, the second drug, which has sometimes been used to induce abortion on its own. Such a move would reverse the miracle of the pills, pushing many desperate women towards methods that are less effective and can carry grave dangers. Another path that Blanche could take to restrict abortion access would be to sue the states that seek to protect it. On the call, Blanche explained his reasoning: “If states have said, ‘We are going to protect the unborn and we’re going to protect every life from the moment of conception,’ we’re putting practices and policies in place so that other states and other organizations can’t attack that. They can’t do things like they’re doing with mailing in mail-order drugs.” Here, Blanche appeared to be referencing shield laws, legislation passed in a number of Democratic-controlled states that prohibits state authorities from participating in other states’ abortion-related investigations and prosecutions. The laws mean that doctors operating out of states like New York or Washington can prescribe and ship abortion drugs to people living in places such as Texas or Arkansas, safe in the knowledge that their own state police will not come knocking at their door to serve another state’s warrant or extradition order. Blanche’s comments suggest that his Department of Justice might sue to have the shield laws declared illegal, thus significantly curtailing liberal states’ rights to choose their own law enforcement priorities and granting conservative states the power to enforce their own laws even beyond their borders. Blanche also appeared to indicate that he would seek to restrict abortion access using other agencies’ powers. On his call with leaders of the Christian right, he said his department was “working hand in hand” with health agencies to make Dobbs permanent. The FDA, which expanded access to mifepristone in 2021 under the Biden administration and made the change permanent in 2023, has been under intense pressure from anti-choice allies in the Maga coalition to revise that guidance, making the drug ineligible for telehealth prescriptions and requiring patients to retrieve it from providers in person, a regulatory move that would also serve to cut off access in Republican controlled states. But the anti-abortion movement is pushing the FDA even further: it has succeeded in getting the agency to initiate a “review” of mifepristone’s safety (though the safety of the drug has been proven by nearly four decades of use worldwide and hundreds of studies), which is widely seen as a pathway for the FDA to create a pretext to remove mifepristone from the market. That’s not fast enough for some on the misogynist right: Louisiana has sued the FDA, asking it to forbid mifepristone from being prescribed via telehealth, in a case that is set to be heard by the ultraconservative fifth circuit next month. So far, the justice department has supported the drug’s online availability in court. Under Blanche, it could reverse that stance. Trump has been gunshy about pursuing the agenda of his antiabortion allies since returning to office. He appears to have been spooked by the political reaction to Dobbs, which was credited for the Democrats’ better-than-expected showing in the 2022 midterms, as well as with a slew of pro-choice victories in special elections in the years that immediately followed the decision. The anti-choice movement has even been angry with Trump for the slow pace of his anti-abortion agenda since his return to power in 2025. Which is not to say that the Trump administration has given the movement nothing: enforcement of the Face Act, a federal law meant to stop anti-choice protestors from physically blocking clinic entrances, has been all but abandoned since Trump returned to the White House; some who were prosecuted under the law have even been pardoned and remunerated by Trump, at taxpayer expense. But until now, Trump has faced a looming threat that seems to have slowed the pace of his anti-abortion policymaking: the 2026 midterms. Soon, that obstacle will be removed. The appointment of Todd Blanche is a dark signal for women’s rights: more abortion restrictions can be expected in 2027. Moira Donegan is a Guardian US columnist