A Stoic SaysA Stoic Says logo - Daily Stoic philosophy and wisdom

September 12, 2026

Why is Trump’s $5,000 offer to voters ‘like a woman’? Ask Fox News | Arwa Mahdawi

In a provocative piece, Arwa Mahdawi critiques Fox News host Jesse Watters for his misogynistic comparison of Donald Trump's $5,000 voter incentive to a woman's enticing nature. Mahdawi argues that this framing distracts from the real issues at play, such as Trump's questionable fiscal promises and the potential consequences of his reckless spending amid soaring national debt. The article highlights the absurdity of Trump's proposal while underscoring a broader concern about his influence on the upcoming midterm elections. Ultimately, Mahdawi calls attention to the troubling intersection of gender dynamics and political rhetoric in contemporary discourse.

Thumbnail for Why is Trump’s $5,000 offer to voters ‘like a woman’? Ask Fox News | Arwa Mahdawi

Stoic Response

Politics & GovernanceJustice & RightsCulture & Identity

Understanding the Tension

In the article by Arwa Mahdawi, the chief tension arises from the juxtaposition of Trump’s ludicrous proposal for voter incentives against the misogynistic framing presented by Jesse Watters. Mahdawi aptly critiques Watters’ assertion that Trump’s $5,000 proposal is akin to a woman’s “enticement,” stating, “That’s a story about fiscal recklessness and empty promises.” This framing not only trivializes significant political issues but also perpetuates harmful gender stereotypes, distracting from the real implications of such fiscal policies.

Recognizing What You Can Control

As Stoics, we must acknowledge the dichotomy of control: we cannot control the words or actions of others, but we can control our responses and our understanding of the situation. In this case, while we cannot change Watters' rhetoric or Trump’s proposals, we can choose how we engage with these narratives and what we allow to influence our thoughts and actions.

Acting with Purpose

  1. Critique with Clarity: When faced with absurd or misogynistic rhetoric, articulate your disagreement clearly and calmly. Use reasoned arguments to highlight the flaws in such comparisons, focusing on the broader implications rather than getting drawn into emotional responses.

  2. Educate Others: Share insights on the importance of recognizing harmful stereotypes and their impact on societal discourse. Encourage discussions that challenge these narratives, fostering a more informed community that values critical thinking over sensationalism.

  3. Focus on the Real Issues: Shift the conversation back to the substantive issues at hand, such as fiscal responsibility and the implications of political promises. By redirecting attention to these topics, you can help elevate the discourse beyond personal attacks and distractions.

  4. Cultivate Resilience: Develop your own inner fortitude by practicing mindfulness and self-reflection. Understand that the chaos of external opinions will always exist, but your peace of mind is within your control. Engage with the world, but do so from a grounded place of reason and virtue.

Conclusion

In a world rife with distractions and divisive rhetoric, let us embody the Stoic principle of focusing on what we can control. By responding thoughtfully, educating ourselves and others, and maintaining our inner resilience, we can navigate the complexities of contemporary discourse with clarity and purpose.

Article Rewritten Through Stoic Lens

The Stoic Perspective on External Events

Understanding the Dichotomy of Control

Dear students, let us reflect upon the recent discourse surrounding the words of Jesse Watters, a host on Fox News, as he intertwines misogyny with political commentary. Here lies an opportunity to practice our understanding of the dichotomy of control: we cannot control what Watters says, but we can control our judgment and response to it.

Misogyny as a Teaching Moment

Watters’ comparison of Donald Trump’s proposed $5,000 voter incentive to the enticing nature of women serves as a reminder of how language can be weaponized. While we cannot change his words, we can choose to respond with discipline and discernment. Instead of succumbing to indignation, let us cultivate a clearer understanding of the underlying issues—fiscal recklessness and empty promises.

Recognizing Empty Promises

Consider the promise of $5,000 to each American, which, if examined closely, reveals a façade of bribery. This is a moment for us to practice judgment. We must discern the reality of such claims rather than accept them blindly. Reflect on the nature of promises made by those in power. The Stoic teaches us to focus on what is within our control—our ability to question and seek truth.

The Nature of Recklessness

As we ponder the implications of such fiscal promises amidst soaring national debt, we must recognize the importance of sound judgment. The Stoics remind us that our actions should be guided by reason. The reckless abandonment of fiscal responsibility is not merely a political issue; it is a moral one. We must ask ourselves: how do our values guide our actions in the face of such recklessness?

The Influence of Rhetoric

Watters’ framing of the situation distracts us from the real issues at hand. We must not allow ourselves to be swayed by sensationalism. Instead, let us focus on the principles of right action. Engage critically with the rhetoric presented to us, and strive to understand the deeper implications of such discourse on our society.

The Role of Gender Dynamics

The intersection of gender dynamics and political rhetoric is troubling. Here, we have an opportunity to reflect on our own biases and judgments. The Stoic path encourages us to examine our beliefs and ensure they align with virtue. Let us not be complicit in perpetuating harmful narratives but instead advocate for a discourse rooted in respect and understanding.

Taking Responsibility for Our Responses

As we navigate the complexities of contemporary discourse, remember that we cannot control the actions of others, but we can control our responses. Let us practice self-discipline in our reactions and strive to engage in meaningful dialogue. Each interaction is an opportunity to embody Stoic principles—wisdom, courage, justice, and temperance.

Conclusion: Embracing Stoic Principles

In conclusion, the events surrounding Watters and Trump provide us with a fertile ground for Stoic reflection. Focus on what you can control: your thoughts, judgments, and actions. Let us engage with the world around us not with anger or despair, but with a commitment to virtue and understanding. In doing so, we not only uplift ourselves but contribute positively to the discourse of our time.

Source Body Text

I think I finally understand why Fox News pays Jesse Watters the big bucks. The network star, famous for hot takes like men shouldn’t “eat soup in public”, has an incredible talent for inserting misogyny into absolutely any news story. Take, for example, Donald Trump’s ludicrous announcement on Wednesday night that he will give every American adult $5,000 if Republicans retain control of the US Congress in November’s midterm election. That’s a story about apparent bribery, right? A story about fiscal recklessness and empty promises. A story about how the president, whose popularity is plummeting, is so out of ideas that he’s resorted (yet again) to dangling cash in front of voters. Actually, says Watters, it’s none of the above; it’s just Trump behaving like a woman. “That $5,000 check, Dana, that’s not a bribe,” Watters told Fox anchor Dana Perino on Thursday. “We’re calling it an enticement … It’s like a woman. Sometimes a woman can entice you, OK? Maybe – it doesn’t mean you’re going home with her, but it keeps you interested. It keeps you intrigued and wanting more. That’s what this is about.” Perhaps the Fox News host isn’t completely wrong. After all, I am a woman and I am about to entice you to look up the story about how Watters courted his much younger second wife. It’s very intriguing. But back to this definitely-not-a-bribe $5,000 payment which the president calls a Trump “dividend”. I wouldn’t start spending it now, if I were you. The president, like his right-hand man Elon Musk, has a habit of making grandiose promises he doesn’t keep. Remember the Doge dividends floated last February? Those haven’t materialized. Nor have the tariff dividends that Trump made so much noise about. “People that are against Tariffs are FOOLS!” Trump said in a Truth Social post last year. “We are taking in Trillions of Dollars and … A dividend of at least $2000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone.” Almost a year after that post, nobody has received a tariff dividend. However, it has been estimated by the Joint Economic Committee – Minority that the average American family will pay more than $2,500 in tariff costs this year. I feel pretty confident saying there is a 0.00001% chance that anyone is going to get a $5,000 Republican celebration check. But let’s just play along for a minute and pretend that Trump isn’t a fabulist. Let’s pretend that the president is a serious man who makes thoughtful policy proposals, rather than an opportunist who says whatever inane thing happens to pop into his brain in the moment. Isn’t it a bit reckless to be giving all this money away, a total that exceeds $1tn, when the US national debt recently surpassed $40tn for the first time? As Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, said in a statement, that debt “doesn’t exist solely on the government’s ledgers”, it is shouldered by everyone. “The more we borrow, the more we exacerbate inflation, squeeze out other priorities in the budget, and leave ourselves vulnerable to emergencies at home and turmoil abroad.” Don’t worry about all that, says the commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick. “It’s not tax money,” Lutnick told NBC News on Thursday. The Trump administration is going to earn that money from various moneymaking endeavours like the Trump Platinum Card, which allows wealthy people to pay up to $5m to extend their US visas. JD Vance, meanwhile, has suggested that the money might come from US tariff revenues, even though economists have pointed out the $125bn in tariff revenues wouldn’t come close to covering the costs. The president himself, meanwhile, doesn’t seem keen to elaborate on his cunning plan to win friends and influence voters. When the ABC reporter Rachel Scott asked him about the rationale behind the $5,000 checks on Thursday night, he said it was a reward to Americans for putting up with Joe Biden. After Scott tried to ask a follow-up question, Trump lunged at her and said: “Your network … you’re the worst.” Which is very on-brand for the president. He can’t seem to handle being asked tough questions by anyone, but gets particularly nasty when those questions are posed by a woman. While Trump doesn’t want to get into the details of his dividend, the proposal reflects how the president is looking at some very unconventional ways to sway the midterms. He may not end up issuing people celebration checks, but he has already gutted election security programs and attempted to limit voting access. The real story here isn’t $5,000 cheques, it’s the fact that America’s self-styled king seems intent on meddling with the election, and no meaningful checks and balances are stopping him. Ectopic pregnancy deaths in the US have nearly doubled A ProPublica analysis found almost 200 women died after an ectopic pregnancy from 2020 to 2025. That’s compared to about 100 in the previous six years. To nobody’s surprise, mortality is worse in states with strict abortion bans. “While they cautioned that abortion bans alone can’t explain the national rise, maternal health experts said any examination of the spike should include the documented delays in care caused by the laws, including for ectopic pregnancies,” ProPublica notes. Sudanese refugees are being forced into sex work Sudan’s civil war, which started in 2023, has created the world’s worst displacement crisis. Now, many of the women who fled to Egypt are being sexually exploited. What’s happened to Pete Hegseth’s testosterone screening guidance? The Pentagon published a guidance document on 2 September outlining a new mandatory testosterone screening process to create a “High-T military”. However, the very next day it was withdrawn from the public domain for reasons that remain unclear. Maybe someone in the Pentagon came to their senses. Secret systems used by Israel in mass killings of Gaza civilians revealed Naza, a highly-feted new film from the Oscar-winning Israeli directors Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor and produced by the Guardian, reveals the secret systems used in mass killings of civilians in Gaza. “Several interviewees worked in a secret intelligence unit that reports directly to the office of Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu,” the Guardian writes. “[O]ne said their mission was to ‘thwart peace’.” Why does the hard right shrug off domestic abusers in their midst? The short answer is because they are misogynists who cynically weaponize women’s rights to advance their agenda. But do read Zoe Williams, who has a longer and more eloquent answer, following on from the attack on a female protester at the Reform UK conference. The Republican convention showed an image of Hasan Piker in his underwear They seem to think showing photos of a buff podcaster in his underwear demonstrates that the left are scary “radicals”. The rise of hairy young women Phoebe Bridgers’ unshaven legs at her Venice film festival debut sparked a flurry of headlines. But, says Leah Harper, Bridgers’ “au naturel look may signal that attitudes are changing – particularly among younger generations”. Emma Bonino, feminist Italian politician, dies aged 78 Bonino got involved in politics after she had an abortion (then illegal) at age 26 and said she decided that “never, never, never again should anyone have to suffer this humiliation”. She handed herself in to the police as an act of protest, leading a campaign to eventually legalize abortion in 1978. Princess Diana’s ‘revenge dress’ is going up for auction Diana famously wore the fitted black dress on the same night that Charles admitted to his infidelity on TV in 1994. It will be auctioned off in December. Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist