Source Body Text

After decades as a renowned international journalist, the CNN star Christiane Amanpour is calling it a career, saying she’ll soon leave the cable network which she joined in 1983. She will be missed for the courage in war zones and forthright presentation that have made her one of the most famous names in media. Amanpour leaves behind not only the legacy of her extraordinary work, but also four words of advice that everyone in the news business should heed. “Be truthful, not neutral,” she has urged many times, including again this week. Tattoo it on your souls, journalists. For what Amanpour is saying in those few words would vastly improve much of the media coverage we see today, as mainstream news organizations desperately try to gain the largest audience by not offending anyone, and by tiptoeing around the reality of today’s corrosive politics. In so doing, they too often soft-pedal the truth. They refer to politicians’ falsehoods not as lies but as “baseless claims”. They describe would-be authoritarian officials as “sidestepping norms” rather than attacking democracy. They “sane-wash” lunatic behavior and they present both sides of every controversy as roughly equal. Amanpour certainly isn’t urging journalists to be activists. She isn’t urging them to drop the ideal of objectivity in which reporting and evidence, not ideology, prevails. She’s not suggesting they become partisans and echo the talking points of any political party or candidate. Far from it, in fact. She’s urging them to drop the false pretense of neutrality and to focus instead on getting to the heart of the matter – yes, the truth. I don’t mean to make Amanpour out to be a saint. Like anyone who has been in the media world for decades, she has her detractors, those who think she has favored one side or another, and been unfair in her reporting. But at a time when journalism – under great pressure from corporate ownership and the realities of a transformed business model – hasn’t consistently hewed to its core mission of informing the public honestly, her words are a lodestar. The historian Garrett Graff wrote recently about the failures of the American press in the dangerous Trump era, especially as the important midterm congressional elections approach and as threats to democracy grow more dire. “The media – which is under immense un-ordinary pressures of its own – continues to fail to convey just how un-ordinary these developments and shifts in our daily life” are, Graff wrote. “Too often, these stories are covered individually, but not as a pattern.” In essence, then, the media is failing Amanpour’s directive to “be truthful”, because it is missing the big picture. Was Amanpour’s decision to retire affected by the “un-ordinary pressures” in the media sphere? She didn’t say so directly as she announced her decision, but her earlier comments about the coming changes at CNN suggest that there was some worry on her part that truth-telling might be threatened by corporate pressures. It’s easy to see why that might be on her mind. CNN’s parent company has just been acquired by a media behemoth, Skydance, headed by David Ellison, the son of one of the world’s richest people, Larry Ellison. The younger Ellison’s moves at CBS News – particularly the installation of the controversial opinion journalist Bari Weiss – have thrown the venerable broadcast network into turmoil. Prominent journalists including Scott Pelley and Anderson Cooper have left or been fired, and insiders have charged that network leadership has intruded on editorial independence. This past spring, Amanpour noted, during a public appearance in London, that she was concerned about the “ideological realignment of CBS and the destruction, potentially, of 60 Minutes”, the network’s flagship news magazine program. She leaves, however, on good terms with the CNN chief executive, Mark Thompson, who will remain at CNN for the time being, which is reassuring to the cable network’s staff. Announcing her departure, Amanpour made a point of saying she’d be cheering on her longtime home and “its history of independent journalism”. It’s hard to believe the uncertain future of CNN wasn’t at least some part of her calculation, although she’s certainly earned the ability to ease away from the tumult and demands of foreign reporting and commentary. Will the younger and less-seasoned journalists who remain in the daily fray be able to heed her “be truthful, not neutral” words? Or will corporate and business pressures push them further toward the performative neutrality that undermines truth-telling? With her stellar career and her pithy advice, Amanpour has set a high bar. Let’s hope reporters and their bosses – not just at CNN but far beyond – can clear that bar, better than in the past. So much depends on it. Margaret Sullivan is a Guardian US columnist writing on media, politics and culture